What recourse is available for repeated violations of Act 230?

The correct choice is associated with the enforcement mechanisms in place for violations of Act 230, which governs plumbing practices in Michigan. Repeated violations indicate a disregard for the established regulations intended to ensure safety and proper standards in plumbing work. Accordingly, increased fines serve as a punitive measure that escalates with the frequency or severity of the violations. This approach aims to deter continued non-compliance by imposing more substantial financial consequences, thereby encouraging adherence to the standards set forth by the Act.

This system of escalating fines is a common practice in regulatory enforcement, as it recognizes that mere warnings or initial penalties may not be sufficient to prevent future infractions. Instead, higher fines increase accountability for plumbing professionals and businesses, urging them to maintain compliance to avoid further financial repercussions.

Other options, while they may seem like potential consequences for non-compliance, do not align with the typical enforcement response outlined in Act 230. For instance, mandatory training sessions could be part of a remedial approach, but they do not serve as a primary recourse for violations. Similarly, imprisonment for longer than 90 days and public service hours are not standard penalties associated directly with repeated regulatory violations under the Act. Instead, these options may be more applicable to criminal offenses or specific legal infractions